DeVonta Smith vs Luther Burden
DeVonta Smith prices 2.0 points higher for dynasty. Full tale of the tape below, then model the deal yourself.
Player comparison
| Metric | WR DeVonta Smith | WR Luther Burden |
|---|---|---|
| Team | PHI | CHI |
| Position | WR | WR |
| Age | 27 | 22 — leads |
| Redraft value | 39.8 — leads | 37.8 |
| Dynasty value | 39.8 — leads | 37.8 |
| VORP (redraft) | 24.7 — leads | 22.7 |
| VORP (dynasty) | 27.0 — leads | 25.0 |
Highlighted cells mark the stronger figure for that metric. For age, lower is treated as the advantage in dynasty formats.
Model this trade
Both players are already loaded. Add picks or extra pieces to either side to find the package that balances the deal.
Team A receives
39.8pts
Type to search players, then use the arrow keys and Enter to add one to Team A.
- WRDeVonta SmithPHI · Age 2739.8
Team B receives
37.8pts
Type to search players, then use the arrow keys and Enter to add one to Team B.
- WRLuther BurdenCHI · Age 2237.8
Verdict
Even trade
Net value · Team A
+2.0
Fairness
95%
RecommendationThis trade is fair and balanced.
Frequently asked
- Who has more dynasty value, DeVonta Smith or Luther Burden?
- DeVonta Smith carries the higher dynasty value: 39.8 against 37.8, a gap of 2.0 points on our 0–100 superflex scale. DeVonta Smith is 27 and Luther Burden is 22, and dynasty pricing applies position-specific age decay on top of a market-derived value curve, not fantasy point projections.
- Which player is better for redraft leagues?
- For win-now redraft leagues, DeVonta Smith is worth more: 39.8 against 37.8. Redraft strips out the age-decay term entirely, which is why the two formats can disagree on the same pair of players.
- How does league size affect this trade?
- Value is measured against the replacement-level starter at each position, and that baseline moves with league size. In a 14-team league the waiver pool is thin, so established starters like these hold more relative value. In an 8-team league the drop-off to a replacement WR is much smaller, which compresses the gap and makes draft picks comparatively more attractive.